guides:user:compliance:examples
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| guides:user:compliance:examples [2022/04/29 08:42] – pgels | guides:user:compliance:examples [2024/07/03 12:31] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Compliance Examples====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Below are few of the practical examples of implementing Network Compliance policies. | ||
| + | These are only for sample reference and actual implementation might differ. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Verifying banner ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Network // | ||
| + | computer networks. | ||
| + | This example is to verify if the login banners are configured using NetYCE Compliance. | ||
| + | * Rule Type: Configuration | ||
| + | * Search based on: Config lines | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Verifying telnet ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Protocols such as // | ||
| + | This example is to verify if telnet is disabled for remote login purpose using Compliance | ||
| + | * Rule Type: Configuration | ||
| + | * Search based on: Config blocks | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Verify that the passwords are encrypted ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | // | ||
| + | This example shows us how to implement compliance policy to verify the devices are configured to show passwords in encrypted format. | ||
| + | * Rule Type: Configuration | ||
| + | * Search based on: Config lines | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Verifying remote-access ACLs ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | // | ||
| + | This example shows how to implement compliance policy to verify the necessary configuration. | ||
| + | * Rule Type: Configuration | ||
| + | * Search based on: Config blocks | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Verifying tacacs ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | // | ||
| + | This example helps in validating tacacs configuration using NetYCE Compliance module | ||
| + | * Rule Type: Configuration | ||
| + | * Search based on: Config lines | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Verifying rfc1583 compatibility ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | // | ||
| + | To minimize the chance of routing loops, all Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) routers in an OSPF routing domain should have RFC compatibility set identically. | ||
| + | This example shows how to implement compliance policy to verify the necessary configuration. | ||
| + | * Rule Type: Configuration | ||
| + | * Search based on: Config blocks | ||
| + | |||