guides:user:compliance:examples
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
guides:user:compliance:examples [2022/04/29 08:36] – pgels | guides:user:compliance:examples [2024/07/03 12:31] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ====== Compliance Examples====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Below are few of the practical examples of implementing Network Compliance policies. | ||
+ | These are only for sample reference and actual implementation might differ. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Verifying banner ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Network // | ||
+ | computer networks. | ||
+ | This example is to verify if the login banners are configured using NetYCE Compliance. | ||
+ | * Rule Type: Configuration | ||
+ | * Search based on: Config lines | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Verifying telnet ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Protocols such as // | ||
+ | This example is to verify if telnet is disabled for remote login purpose using Compliance | ||
+ | * Rule Type: Configuration | ||
+ | * Search based on: Config blocks | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Verify that the passwords are encrypted ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | // | ||
+ | This example shows us how to implement compliance policy to verify the devices are configured to show passwords in encrypted format. | ||
+ | * Rule Type: Configuration | ||
+ | * Search based on: Config lines | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Verifying remote-access ACLs ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | // | ||
+ | This example shows how to implement compliance policy to verify the necessary configuration. | ||
+ | * Rule Type: Configuration | ||
+ | * Search based on: Config blocks | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Verifying tacacs ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | // | ||
+ | This example helps in validating tacacs configuration using NetYCE Compliance module | ||
+ | * Rule Type: Configuration | ||
+ | * Search based on: Config lines | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Verifying rfc1583 compatibility ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | // | ||
+ | To minimize the chance of routing loops, all Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) routers in an OSPF routing domain should have RFC compatibility set identically. | ||
+ | This example shows how to implement compliance policy to verify the necessary configuration. | ||
+ | * Rule Type: Configuration | ||
+ | * Search based on: Config blocks | ||
+ | |||